Anthony Samsel
"Infant formulas are soy based and 90 % of the soy sampled by USDA found it highly contaminated with Monsanto's Roundup-glyphosate herbicide. Infant formula is now a delivery system for one of the most insidious chemicals on earth which chelates and ties up some of the most important elements necessary for proper development, growth and overall health.
The FDA's statement is a joke obviously written by PR staff. Nothing could be further from the truth. The agency states: “The FDA sets high quality standards for infant formulas because nutritional deficiencies during this critical time of development can have a significant impact on a child’s long-term health and well-being. This rule will help to prevent adulteration in infant formula and ensure infant formula supports normal, physical growth.” This is drivel !
Glyphosate disrupts the CYP 450 enzymes and the homeostasis of gut bacteria necessary for the production of the aromatic amino acids phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan. It also interferes with methionine and selenocysteine.
The public must be alerted to the dangers of glyphosate in infant formula..."
Consider page 71 of the handbook cautioning, “It should be clearly kept in mind that most of the substances under consideration are poisonous. If they were not, they would probably be useless against the insects for which they are recommended. Therefore, the recommendations for the proper use of these substances should be followed. Careless, unnecessary exposure and misuse is [sic] fraught with hazard.”
Here is the twist I promised.
Using the chemicals in vaccines is easily understood by looking at who owns the patent for DDT.
On page 3 of the handbook it states, “The Geigy company holds the patents on the use of the compound [DDT] as an insecticide. The United States patent is No. 2,329,074, issued September 7, 1943, to Paul Müller.” [emphasis mine]
Geigy company is now known as Novartis Pharmaceuticals, a vaccine manufacturer.
What does it all mean?
In a nutshell, the same companies who formulated and patented DDT, are putting the same industrial chemicals in childhood vaccines. To add insult to injury, their public relations campaigns brainwash doctors and the scientific community into believing that injecting babies, even in small amounts with these chemicals, is somehow okay. Even more bizarre are claims chemicals such as Triton X-100 or Tween 80 are involved in promoting health!
We are publishing this information to educate Congress, the media, and public regarding issues affecting the health and well-being of our citizens. It is not our intention to infringe upon anyone’s copyright. We believe we have used the U.S. Copyright’s Doctrine of Fair Use equitably and without incurring infringement or plagiarism.
http://vactruth.com/2011/09/10/wwii-military-handbook-reveals-pesticide-chemicals-used-in-infant-vaccines/
"Infant formulas are soy based and 90 % of the soy sampled by USDA found it highly contaminated with Monsanto's Roundup-glyphosate herbicide. Infant formula is now a delivery system for one of the most insidious chemicals on earth which chelates and ties up some of the most important elements necessary for proper development, growth and overall health.
The FDA's statement is a joke obviously written by PR staff. Nothing could be further from the truth. The agency states: “The FDA sets high quality standards for infant formulas because nutritional deficiencies during this critical time of development can have a significant impact on a child’s long-term health and well-being. This rule will help to prevent adulteration in infant formula and ensure infant formula supports normal, physical growth.” This is drivel !
Glyphosate disrupts the CYP 450 enzymes and the homeostasis of gut bacteria necessary for the production of the aromatic amino acids phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan. It also interferes with methionine and selenocysteine.
The public must be alerted to the dangers of glyphosate in infant formula..."
FDA Releases Interim Rule for Infant Formula
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has released an interim final rule and draft guidance documents regarding the manufacturing standards of infant formula.
Only 75 percent of infants in the U.S. start out being breastfed and by age three months, two-thirds rely on infant formula for some portion of their nutrition. The rule is meant to ensure that formulas for infants without unusual medical or dietary problems are safe and support healthy growth.
The draft guidance documents issued alongside the interim final rule address how manufacturers can demonstrate that their products meet the quality factor requirements of the interim final rule and information about manufacturing formulas made for infants with unusual medical or dietary problems
“Many families rely on infant formula as either the sole source of nutrition or an integral part of an infant’s diet through 12 months of age,” said Michael Taylor, the FDA’s deputy commissioner for foods and veterinary medicine. “The FDA sets high quality standards for infant formulas because nutritional deficiencies during this critical time of development can have a significant impact on a child’s long-term health and well-being.”
The interim final rule amends the FDA’s quality control procedures, notification, and record and reporting requirements for manufacturers of infant formulas. It also establishes current good manufacturing practices and requires testing for Cronobacter and Salmonella contamination.
FDA says that companies currently manufacturing infant formula in the U.S. already voluntarily conduct many of the current good manufacturing practices and quality control procedures included in the rule.
The agency will be accepting comments from the public on issues or information not previously considered in the interim final rule.
And then there is this...
Pharmaceutical companies have yet to explain how injecting such toxic substances into a baby actually makes them healthier. You’ll see how they have known about this information for some time.Consider page 71 of the handbook cautioning, “It should be clearly kept in mind that most of the substances under consideration are poisonous. If they were not, they would probably be useless against the insects for which they are recommended. Therefore, the recommendations for the proper use of these substances should be followed. Careless, unnecessary exposure and misuse is [sic] fraught with hazard.”
Here is the twist I promised.
Using the chemicals in vaccines is easily understood by looking at who owns the patent for DDT.
On page 3 of the handbook it states, “The Geigy company holds the patents on the use of the compound [DDT] as an insecticide. The United States patent is No. 2,329,074, issued September 7, 1943, to Paul Müller.” [emphasis mine]
Geigy company is now known as Novartis Pharmaceuticals, a vaccine manufacturer.
What does it all mean?
In a nutshell, the same companies who formulated and patented DDT, are putting the same industrial chemicals in childhood vaccines. To add insult to injury, their public relations campaigns brainwash doctors and the scientific community into believing that injecting babies, even in small amounts with these chemicals, is somehow okay. Even more bizarre are claims chemicals such as Triton X-100 or Tween 80 are involved in promoting health!
***
No comments:
Post a Comment