Tuesday, December 23, 2014

Intentional Harm Dioxin from Cane Buring, Experimental RNAi Pesticide, and Splenda in Us

Toxic Load! They made that up to justify their murderous actions!!!!
There is never any justification, or sense in the fact humans can have dead brain, or body cells as something that is normal procedure in our lives, or in any other Kingdom of LIFE!... That's why it is called LIFE!

Wonder who does the dirty work...and are never seen again?

Saw someone post this comment...
"Many KAUAI Community Residents and workers are sick, dying, and dead. Chemical Corporations bring migrant workers from Mexico and South America on 6 to 8 month rotations. It used to be longer but the workers get sick within a year or so. Now after 6 months, they're sent back home to get sick. INTENTIONAL MURDER !!!!!!"

Meanwhile on Maui...

Questioning spraying of 3 chemicals at once RoundUp. Atrazine and another I don't know...
Being used to dry sugar cane before burning for harvest...
Doesn't this create dioxin during the burn ?
And when the sugar is processed won't there be dioxin coming out of the smoke stack?
What do you think...about this ?
At 16 minutes this man Chris You see someone has redacted what he said @16:58...What he said was he had the stuff chemically analysed, and what he found were these 3 chemicals...from what I can remember...Because I'm next at 19 minutes...Just so happens I'm the wrong person to redact in front of...He named 3 one was Atrazine, one was glyphosphate I believe...I do not remember the other one Chris named...Still looking for my notes from that day.
Sorry I failed to post this before...@16 minutes the man in Kuau I am talking about who had parts of his testimony blacked out, and I am next...I make the guy after me a big liar too...

Here is a note I wrote that day on FB with this video...Not 3, but 5 pesticides were found in the analysis by the laboratory that made this man so sick!

 Dioxins as harmful the first day it was created...for 500 years bound to the soil... Dioxin is created in the manufacture of pesticides by high heat. We are all being poisoned.and it takes a bum like me to figure this effect out, and we are being constant poisoned!??!

Dioxin Health Side Effects Dioxin is commonly a byproduct of internal combustion and in high concentrations, poses serious human health risks. Complications due to overexposure to dioxin are numerous. The most serious health complication associated with this highly toxic chemical is cancer. Some other complications include: Newborn defects Diabetes Lung disorders Immune system problems Often dioxin is introduced into the human body through diet. Many meat, fish and dairy products are contaminated with dangerous levels of dioxin due to the fact that dioxin often ends up in the soil and sediments where these animals feed. Chemical Exposure Lawsuit Attorneys If you or a loved one were exposed to dioxins and suffering from serious side effects you may be entitled to compensation for your injuries. Contact an attorney today to learn more about your legal rights...


People are sick...in Hawaii...Don't believe that magazine article saying we are the healthiest in the USA!

We have the highest rates of breast cancer on Maui in USA, and on Kauai they have 10xs the national rate of a heart deformity...Among many other sicknesses we are suffering from ...Like on Maui we also have the highest rate of Hepitiis C for the USA...10xs what is considered normal...BECAUSE they are growing it in the GMO CORN????

Did you know the Air Forces operation to spray Vietnam was "Operation Ranch Hand" very similar...The county councils, state Ag, State officials in every dept, U of Hawaii, and the U of Hawaii Board , professors, and admins personal corporation HawaiiBIOTECH‬... They use Hegelian Dialect...

These monsters, who are the U of H school of medicene, U of H admins, board, and professors started this corporation ...and why Judge Kurren has stepped aside in our case...His wife is the one who was the "BRAINS" behind it!!!....They  have 300 clinical trials going on in Hawaii with associations with all the major chemical corporations pharma spin-offs using GMO in vaccines...They say it's easier to trick people to become a part of their studies here in Hawaii..!!!! I guess we are really stupid here!!!

vaccine technology

West Nile Virus
Hawaii Biotech believes that its experience and ability in producing protein antigens allows the Company to develop vaccines targeting numerous infectious diseases. These prophylactic vaccines are well suited to meet demanding requirements for safety, production yield, rapid response, and efficacy. The Company’s vaccine technology is based on the production of high quality recombinant proteins using stable insect cell lines. The high quality of the proteins produced results in immune responses equivalent to, or better than, traditional live or inactivated virus approaches. Furthermore, the purified recombinant proteins provide for an improved safety profile. This platform technology is applicable to a wide variety of diseases including West Nile, dengue, tick borne encephalitis, influenza, hepatitis C, malaria, Japanese encephalitis, Ebola, Eastern equine encephalitis, and others. We have focused our attention on the development of vaccines against West Nile, dengue, and tick borne encephalitis viruses. Analysis by X-ray crystallography of one of HBI’s dengue proteins was featured on the cover of the journal “Nature” (January 22nd, 2004).
Several reasons make Hawaii a viable place for Hawaii Biotech:
• Large University of Hawaii Research Effort
• Clinical Trial Center
Large University of Hawaii Research Effort
Hawaii Biotech is a potential beneficiary of a much larger biotech research effort occurring at the University of Hawaii (UH). UH has established a new $150 million biomedical research facility, which will house 30-40 new biotech researchers. When combined with more than $50 million in biotech related research currently in place at UH, this expanded effort is expected to provide a catalyst for the development of the biotech industry in Hawaii.
As the oldest biotech company in Hawaii, Hawaii Biotech is uniquely positioned to benefit from this research. We have excellent long term relationships with UH and their technology transfer office, as several of the Company’s founders were faculty members at UH.
Clinical Trial Center
Hawaii is emerging as a preferred location for human clinical trials conducted by major pharmaceutical, biotech, contract research organizations (CROs), and site management organizations (SMOs) looking to bridge Caucasian, Japanese, and other Oriental populations. Hawaii’s dense population and ease of patient recruitment gives it a competitive advantage compared to other areas in the country with a large Japanese ethnic population. In addition, Hawaii has developed clinical development capabilities that have attracted non-ethnic studies as well.
Close to 300 clinical trials are currently underway in Hawaii. Sponsors and managers include each of the ten largest global pharmaceutical companies, 42 of the 50 largest pharmaceutical/biotech companies, major CROs and SMOs, and government agencies, including Merck, Pfizer, Amgen, Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Biogen-Idec, Quintiles, Covance, Radiant Research, and the National Cancer Institute. This clinical trial capability provides Hawaii Biotech with convenient access to a critical mass of infrastructure important to its value creation strategy.

The entire operation in Vietnam was call "Operation Hades"...Perfect for Mon Satan...Who along with DOW made a pesticide laced with DIOXIN‬, which lasts 500 years attached to the soil...
Doing this on islands in the middle of the sea, and suing us to continue to do so...

The new study, however, may be the most concerning yet to surface in the peer-reviewed literature. Titled, “Sucralose, a synthetic organochlorine sweetener: overview of biological issues,” it reveals an extensive array of hitherto underreported safety concerns, not the least of which is the formation of highly toxic chlorinated compounds, including dioxins, when Splenda is used in baking, an application which its manufacturer, McNeil Nutritionals (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), actively encourages it to be used for. [see: Cooking and Baking: SPLENDA®]
A Dizzying Array of Splenda (Sucralose) Safety Concerns That Have Never Been Adequately Tested
The study argues that, despite its widespread approval and use, further scientific safety research is warranted due the following significant findings:
  • “Sucralose alters metabolic parameters and its chronic effects on body weight are unknown”: both animal and human research indicates sucralose may raise blood sugar and insulin levels, indicating it may have diabetogenic properties.
  • “Sucralose alters P-gp and CYP expression”: While classified as a food additive, sucralose’s organochlorine structure indicates it interferes with a wide range of organochlorine class drugs, and activates detoxification pathways and enzymes, in a manner similar to these xenobiotic chemicals.
  • “The metabolic fate and health profile of sucralose metabolites are currently unknown”: Contrary to statements in the research literature that sucralose passes through the body in the feces ‘unchanged,’ metabolites have been detected in the urine and feces of both animals and humans, the nature and health consequence of which have never been studied
  • “Sucralose alters indigenous bacterial balancein the GIT”: Sucralose (delivered as Splenda) has been found to reduce the number of beneficial bacteria in the gastrointesintal tract (e.g., lactobacilli, bifidobacteria), while  increasing the more detrimental bacteria (e.g., enterobacteria). One study found the adverse effects on flora did not return to normal (baseline) after a 3-month recovery period. Sucralose also altered the pH of the gastrointestinal tract.
Finally, and perhaps most importantly:
  • “Numerous toxicological issues regarding long-term exposure to sucralose are unresolved”: 1) DNA damage (genotoxicity), and possible adverse epigenetic alterations. 2) The generation of toxic compounds during baking, including chloropropanols, 1,6-DCF and dioxins. 3) The bioaccumulation of sucralose and/or its metabolites 4) The interaction between sucralose and/or its metabolites with drugs have not yet been studied or evaluated
Cancer-Causing Dioxins and Dioxin-Like Compounds Formed When Splenda (Sucralose) Is Cooked
As the reader can plainly see, the picture is a complex one, and there are more unresolved questions than answers. But perhaps the most concerning issue addressed in the report is the ‘Safety of Sucralose That Has Been Heated.’ According to the paper, historically, sucralose was reported to be heat stable at temperatures used in cooking. But they cite a number of reports from independent laboratories showing that sucralose undergoes thermal degradation when heated. One study showed that the stability of sucralose decreased as the temperature and pH increased, with the breakdown process commencing at 119 degrees Celsius and temperatures of 180 degrees Celsius causing its complete degradation at all pH levels with the release of chloride ions.  Additionally, they refer to research showing that sucralose can break down into the following concerning compounds when heated:
  • Chloropopanols are generated when sucralose was heated in the presence of glycerol. Chloropopanols are a group of contaminants that include known genotoxic, carcinogenic and tumorigenic compounds.
  • Other chlorinated compounds formed when sucralose is heated in the presence of food include dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans, dioxin-like polychlorinated bisphenyls and polychlorinated naphthalenes.
Chlorinated compounds like dioxins and DDT are notorious for being both highly toxic and resistant to breaking down once released into the environment, which is why they are classified as ‘persistent organic pollutants.’ Splenda was launched in 2000 with tagline “Made from sugar, so it tastes like sugar,” until it retired this slogan in 2007 after settling with its rival, Merisant Co., the maker of Equal, who accused the makers of Splenda of intentionally confusing consumers into thinking its product was more natural and healthier than other artificial sweeteners. Long gone are the days that this artificial sweetener can be marketed as natural, safe and a healthy alternative to sugar. To the contrary, today’s research clearly indicates that sucralose is a toxic chemical that we should go to great lengths to avoid exposure to rather than something we should intentionally add to our food. You will also find a growing body of research that indicates that sucralose not only does not break down in the environment, but survives water treatment plant purification techniques, with the inevitable consequence that it is accumulating in concentrations in our drinking water and the environment that may adversely impact humans and wildlife alike.
The discovery that thermal breakdown through cooking can lead to the formation of highly toxic and equally persistent chlorinated compounds, including dioxins, should raise a series of red flags for consumers, manufacturers and regulators as the information becomes more widespread. A cursory perusal of the World Health Organization’s description of ‘Dioxins and their effects on human health,’ which lists it as belonging to the “dirty dozen” of the world’s most dangerous pollutants, will see what is at stake here. For more information on the formation of toxic chlorinated byproducts following the heating of sucralose read a 2013 study published in Scientific Reports titled, “Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans formed from sucralose at high temperatures,” which goes into the topic in greater depth.
The Acceptable Daily Intake of Splenda (Sucralose) May Have Been Set 100’s of Times Too High To Ensure Safety
Lastly, an equally concerning issue addressed by the paper is the problem of the acceptable daily intake (ADI). The FDA approved an ADI for humans of 5 mg/kg/day in 1998 based on toxicity studies in rats by determining a no-observed-effect level (NOEL) of 500 mg/kg/day, and then applying a 100-fold safety factor. Since then, research has emerged showing that the NOEL in the microbiome (‘gut bacteria’) of rats for Splenda is actually as low as 1.1 mg/kg/day – 454 times lower than first determined – and 3.3 mg/kg/day for changes in intestinal P-gp and CYP – 151 times lower than first determined. Therefore, if the biological effects of sucralose in rats and humans are the same, or similar, then significant effects would be expected in humans far below the ADI.

Major breakthrough could help detoxify pollutants
October 19, 2014
Manchester University

A major breakthrough could lead to more effective methods for detoxifying dangerous pollutants like PCBs and dioxins, scientists say. The result is a culmination of 15 years of research. It details how certain organisms manage to lower the toxicity of pollutants.

The team at the MIB were finally able to obtain key proteins through genetic modification of other, faster growing organisms. They then used X-ray crystallography to study in 3D how halogen removal is achieved.

The main drive behind this research has been to look at ways of combatting the dozens of very harmful molecules that have been released into the environment. Many have been directly expelled by pollutants or from burning household waste. As the concentration of these molecules has increased over time their presence poses more of a threat to the environment and humanity. Some measures have already been taken to limit the production of pollutants, for example PCBs were banned in the United States in the 1970s and worldwide in 2001.

Professor Leys says: "As well as combatting the toxicity and longevity of pollutants we're also confident that our findings can help to develop a better method for screening environmental or food samples."

OK...What does it mean that they are making mammalian modification to neutralize poisons in us and in our environment...

"Scientists" work 15 years...to develop their BS and lies so we find it acceptable...
IT'S NOT!...Our bodies already do this naturally, and no matter what excuse is made it's not safe, and/or intelligent to do so...
This is another Mitochondria, RNAi...DNA transcription that will affect all humans and animals when it is let loose upon the Earth, and our world...
Who do these people think they are???
They studied 15 years? 
I Googled for 15 seconds!

Added with Clorox in our water and homes we create a chemical reaction in our bodies that are the catalyst for CANCERS!
Rhodanese is a mitochondrial enzyme that detoxifies cyanide (CN-) by converting it to thiocyanate (SCN-).[1]
This reaction takes place in two steps. The diagram on the right shows thecrystallographically-determined structure of rhodanese. In the first step,thiosulfate reacts with the thiol group on Cysteine-247 1, to form a disulfide 2. In the second step, the disulfide reacts with cyanide to produce thiocyanate, itself being converted back into the "normal" thiol 1.
This reaction is important for the treatment of exposure to cyanide, since the thiocyanate formed is less toxic.[medical citation needed] The use of thiosulfate solution as an antidote for cyanide poisoning is based on the activation of this enzymatic cycle.
Rhodanese shares evolutionary relationship with a large family of proteins, including
Cdc25 phosphatase catalytic domain.
non-catalytic domains of eukaryotic dual-specificity MAPK-phosphatases
non-catalytic domains of yeast PTP-type MAPK-phosphatases
non-catalytic domains of yeast Ubp4, Ubp5, Ubp7
non-catalytic domains of mammalian Ubp-Y
Drosophila heat shock protein HSP-67BB
several bacterial cold-shock and phage shock proteins
plant senescence associated proteins
catalytic and non-catalytic domains of rhodanese (see ).
Rhodanese has an internal duplication. This domain is found as a single copy in other proteins, including phosphatases and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolases.[2]
Human proteins containing this domain[edit]
and sweating to get it out is a clue too...

These guys seem to know what they are talking about...They are saying our body makes an antidote, and what the body does not need in it's resource pool it emits...thru urine the left over...The thoery of drinking Orin..." EXCRETION
After metabolism in the animal body, most of the HCN moiety is eliminated as thiocyanate in the urine "

"CN ion released is detoxified or converted by an enzyme normally occurring in the organism and known as rhodanese or thiosulfate transulfurase. The product of such conversion is thiocyanate, a compound found in the tissues of all vertebrates, many invertebrates and a number of plants. ..." 

...some of which may be eliminated from the body in the urine and feces with the remainder persisting as part of the normal "cyanide metabolic pool"."...
Nitrilosides are produced by, and HCN enters into the metabolism of, members of the plant kingdom extending from bacteria, moulds and fungi to the common fruits - apricots, peaches, cherries, berries, and the like - comprising the Rosaceae and extending through the Leguminosae - lima beans, vetch, pulses, clovers - to the Graminae with over eighty grasses of the latter family carrying one or more specific nitrilosides.
No area of the earth that supports vegetation lacks nitriloside-containing plants. Over 30 per cent of all tropical plants, edible or inedible by man or animals, contain a nitriloside. From the nitriloside-rich salmon-berry, cloud-berry or buffalo-berry (Rubus spectabilis) growing on the Arctic tundra and the arrow-grass growing in arctic marshes and supplying the major fodder for the caribou, to the cassava or manioc - the bread of the tropics - plants extraordinarily rich in nitriloside, and serving as food for man and animals, are found in abundance. All life on earth participates directly or indirectly in the chain of nitriloside metabolism. In terms of living forms, the nitrilosides appear as ubiquitous in time as they do in space. There is some evidence that life on earth commenced in conjunction with hydrogen cyanide.
A glance at the vegetation about us almost anywhere will disclose nitriloside-containing plants. The common weed and fodder, Johnson-grass, often carries 15,000 mg/kg or more of nitriloside. A similar concentration is found in Sudan-grass, Velvet grass, white clover, the Yetches, buckwheat, the millets, alfalfa or lucerne, lima beans, even some strains of green or garden peas, the quinces, all species of the passion-flower. The seeds as well as the leaves and roots of the peaches and various cherries are but a few of the natural sources of this essentially non-toxic water-soluble factor.
Though the nitrilosides are plant-produced, we are interested here only in their metabolic role in the animal kingdom. We know that they account largely if not exclusively for all the thiocyanate found in the tissue and body fluids of animals. Thiocyanate is found in the serum, urine, sweat, saliva and tears of man and other mammals. Thiocyanate, as well as its natural precursor, the HCN derived from dietary nitrilosides, supply the cyanide ion for the nitrilization of the precursor of vitamin B12 (hydro[xy]cobalamin) to vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin).
Upon hydrolysis in the intestinal tract of man or animals, the nitriloside exerts a variable antibiotic effect through the action of the freed hydrogen cyanide and, in the case of some nitrilosides such as amygdalin or dhurrin, through the antiseptic action of benzaldehyde or p-hydroxybenzaldehyde aglycone. The latter from Johnson-grass, before and after oxidation to a benzoic acid, is about 30 times more antiseptic (in terms of the phenol coefficient) than ordinary benzaldehyde or benzoic acid. It is now experimentally established that only those nitrile compounds that are hydrolyzed to free hydrogen cyanide lend themselves to the formation, through rhodanese in the presence of utilizable sulfur, of thiocyanate.
After metabolism in the animal body, most of the HCN moiety is eliminated as thiocyanate in the urine with possibly some being eliminated in the feces. In man, a small percentage of the nitriloside-derived HCN may be excreted through the lungs and even in the urine. In rabbits, the administration of one nitriloside (amygdalin) has been reported as resulting in the elimination of traces of the unchanged nitriloside in the urine. Sorghum and other plants involved in cyanogenesis associated with the synthesis of nitriloside are known to emit a small percentage of free HCN.
In the case of nitrilosides with an acetone aglycone or an ethylmethyl-ketone aglycone, the ketone aglycones as well as the sugar moiety are probably fully metabolized to carbon dioxide and water with the HCN residue contributing to the production of thiocyanate, some of which may be eliminated from the body in the urine and feces with the remainder persisting as part of the normal "cyanide metabolic pool"."

According to the epa ferrocyanide is a weapon of mass distruction. i learned this while trying ot find out how to safely dispose of the remainder of a bottle of chlorox my girlfriend has been rubbing on her psoriasis. she has beaten cancer twice. the ferrocyanide is not lised on the lable or at the chlorox web site because it is less tha !% and it is not required.However two gallons of chlorox spilled is an EPA reportable spill. She says the ferro cyanide becomes like an oil in our water heaters, and pipes if our city uses this type of bleach...esp...the other bleach isn't that great either...She tells how to flush the system...

She advises living in untreated water.
And not using it to clean house either...Suggests a paper sheet...and plastic in bed as a way to sweat it out...and washing the insides...


These "scientists" need to be de-funded!

Thursday, December 18, 2014

Zombieism Parasite...? YES!!! Cure? Yes!!!

80 % or MORE of humans are right NOW infected with the ZOMBIE PARASITE (this fact used to be on the W.H.O. website but NOT ANY MORE) and the CURE is Niacin. Dr. Andrew Saul explains how "schizophrenia" can be cured with Niacin on his page "doctor yourself." He doesn't know WHY though~~~

Niacin is actually NICOTINIC ACID....the organic acid that specifically targets and KILLS the Toxoplasma Gondii. At the heart of every organic cure is an organic acid~~NEVER forget that. It's why vitamin C works; vitamin C is ASCORBIC ACID. Nicotinic acid is why Niacin can give you rashes, hives, rapid heartbeat, sweats, and other uncomfortable symptoms~~IT'S BURNING THE PARASITE OUT OF YOU. After you take Niacin for a while the burning stops; because you've killed as many parasites as you can with the amount of Niacin taken. You may need HIGH doses if there's "genetic"(bullshit, you pass the parasite from mother to child during BIRTH) mental illness in your family. That means the T. Gondii has been passed generationally and built up a tolerance for Niacin~~so you may need massive doses before you see a difference if you're schizophrenic or BiPolar. You also need to stop eating ALL GMO'S, meats, DAIRY, and especially cow products (RIDDLED WITH T. GONDII) or you'll keep infecting yourself. And T. Gondi can procreate ANYWHERE, not just in a cat's stomach. They're living creatures with both male and female sex organs, they don't even need a mate let alone anyone's permission to make babies where they choose. In your brain is just as good as in a cat.

The government WANTS THIS INSANTIY!! The crazier we are, the more money we'll spend on "treatments" from western medicine and BIG PHARMA thinking there's something "genetically wrong" with our minds, morals, and intelligence. There isn't, it's just the zombie apocalypse. NOW FIX IT.

If you Google (copy-paste) "Toxoplasmosis in Human NIH" or "Toxoplasma Gondii BiPolar NIH" or "Toxoplasma Gondii Schizophrenia NIH" and you'll find a Nat'l Institute of Health study that links T. Gondii to BiPolar, Schizophrenia, depression, OCD, lowered I.Q., Parkinson's, suicide, SEXUAL PERVERSIONS, MORE. This parasite is so prevalent because it's in all mammals and even birds, so if you eat meat, live on a farm, are around mammals, own a cat or drink milk YOU WILL BE INFECTED. It's also in VACCINES. Big Pharma combines the DNA of mammals now with whatever plague they're shooting you up with and there's no way to remove ALL T. Gondii from vaccines using mammal DNA--and that's not the worst of it.

If you WANT to genetically MUTATE any living creature the rules of microbiology are simple ~ YOU MUST COMBINE BACTERIA WITH DNA AND INJECT IT INTO THE VEIN AND IT WILL BREAK THE TARGET MAMMALS GENETIC CODE WHEN DIRECTED INTO THE BLOOD STREAM ~~ BY-PASSING THE IMMUNE SYSTEM AND BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER. Your body has certain defense systems in place to fight off disease. Injecting it directly into your veins BYPASSES ALL THOSE DEFENSES. So it's super simple to INFECT EVERYONE with the T. Gondii cuz you think you're getting a simple "inoculation" when really you're being injected DIRECT TO BRAIN with the ZOMBIE PARASITE. The DNA that's in vaccines is from animals notorious for being carriers of T. Gondii. (like COWS) So with every vaccine you're playing Russian Roulette on yourself or your child with the Zombie Parasite. Got a rebellious kid? T. Gondii could be why! Give them low-dose Niacin and if they react violently you'll have your answer. If you do have a bad infection you'll want to get with an orthomolecular practitioner or someone who knows organic cures to help you.

The T. Gondii was discovered in 1908 AND HIDDEN.(History of the Toxoplasma Gondii; the First 100 years) It was left out of books, texts, literature and research and only spoken of in the inner circles of Washington and "privileged" doctors. The Government then cultivated, harvested and mutated this parasite inside the linings of cat stomachs for DECADES. There could now be 100s of strains of this parasite; depending on where it infects your brain, each one CAUSES A DIFFERENT MENTAL DISORDER.

Somebody posted that above...I saw it, and am sharing...
More info...

I think some of my symptoms of the pesticide poisoning was a die off ...Humans get heartworms but our bodies do not allow for some reason...for them to reach the adult stage in our hearts...I think.

"Role of Wolbachia[edit]
Wolbachia pipientis is an intracellular bacterium that is an endosymbiont of Dirofilaria immitis. All heartworms are thought to be infected with Wolbachia to some degree. Research indicates the inflammation occurring at the die-off of adult heartworms or larvae is in part due to the release of Wolbachia bacteria or protein into the tissues. This may be particularly significant in cats, in which the disease seems to be more related to larval death than living adult heartworms (see below). Treating heartworm-positive animals with an antibiotic such as doxycycline to remove Wolbachia may prove to be beneficial, but further studies are necessary."

Our sicknesses make money...What we get is treatment of symptoms and not the cure...
Divine Love and Freedom! Greetings my beloved, This video is a serious Must Watch! It has the potential to save your life! We will gain awareness on the source of nearly ALL diseases, The divine design of our bodies, how aliens are running the matrix, the science of water and suppressed information. Much awareness to be gained! A lot of illusions to purify! LET'S DO THIS!!!

Did you know that cancer is an obligate glucose metabolizer (meaning it needs sugar to thrive)? Non-cancerous cells can live and grow without glucose, while cancer cells depend on it. In fact, cancer cells absorb 300-500% more glucose than normal cells.

Did Mother Earth intend for us to consume all these high, genetically modified carbohydrate foods like corn, soy, and wheat!? Ask yourself this: With 8 hormones in your body used to raise blood sugars and only one to drop, maybe there is a very important message we are missing here!

Maybe it’s time we go back to basics and start eating real food, and not food look alikes.

Glyphosate Formulations (Round Up) Induce ...OMG

**"This dilution level is far below agricultural recommendations and corresponds to low levels of residues in food or feed. "**

++"through an inhibition of the mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase activity, and necrosis, by release of cytosolic adenylate kinase measuring membrane damage. They also induce apoptosis via activation of enzymatic caspases 3/7 activity. This is confirmed by characteristic DNA fragmentation, nuclear shrinkage (pyknosis), and nuclear fragmentation (karyorrhexis), which is demonstrated by DAPI in apoptotic round cells. G provokes only apoptosis, and HUVEC are 100 times more sensitive overall at this level. The deleterious effects..." ++

Organophosphate poisoning leads to the irreversible blockade of antocholinesterase which results in a cholingeric crisis.
If diagnosed soon after exposure, orgnaophosphate poisoning may be reversed by administering pralidoxime (2-PAM) which breaks the covalent bond between the phosphate of the pesticide and the esteratic group of acetylcholinesterase. Delayed toxicity is associated with peripheral neuropathy ( ataxia and motor weakness) due to axonal degeneration.

"Previous studies have revealed that at low doses, organophosphorus pesticides not only act as genotoxic agents but also affect several other biochemical pathways. The aim of the current investigation was to assess apoptosis and necrosis caused by these pesticides on human peripheral blood lymphocytes under in vitro conditions using the DNA diffusion assay. Our studies have revealed that all the above pesticides induced apoptosis and necrosis in cultured human peripheral blood lymphocytes in in vitro conditions. The results are statistically significant (p < 0.001). Data on these alterations of immune cells are required for understanding the subchronic effects mediated by pesticides on nontarget organisms."

PA for review to re approve glyphosate. Glyphosate is a chemical sprayed on 80% of GMOs, which make up 90% of our food crops which end up in 85% of America's processed food. It does not wash or cook off. Our infertility/sterility/miscarriage rate is 30% in the USA, the highest in recorded history. This rate directly correlates with pigs which consumed glyphosate sprayed grains and jumped from 3% to 30% miscarriage rate, then back down to 3% when they ate non-glyphosate sprayed grains. These are our babies. We will protect them!

Sunday, November 9, 2014

Safety Testing Will Fail PROOF! NO GMO MAUI for Eternity...

Exposed: Monsanto's fraudulent safety tests for GM Soy
The following documents show how the systematic corruption of governmental responsibility by GM developers and proponents underlies the release of GM crops to environment
They do not know what they are doing and they lie...

Scientists Expose Monsanto's Fraudulent Safety-Testing Data for GE Soybeans Monsanto GM soybean safety assessment flawed, Japan researcher says
(Sunday, Nov. 16, 2003 -- CropChoice news) --
Pacific Ecologist: Monsanto's safety assessment application to the Japanese health ministry for Roundup Ready soybeans was "inadequate and incomplete," according to assistant professor MASAHARU KAWATA, of Nagoya University, Japan.

Monsanto maintains there is no difference between GM soybeans and conventional strains. But according to the Japanese study, Monsanto's safety tests misrepresent data and included testing proteins not derived from the GM plant; insufficient feeding experiments; and intentional neglect of "inappropriate" data. Since the components of the GE soybean that people are eating are still unknown, governments who have approved the GE soybean should review their safety assessments.

Tested soybeans not exposed to herbicide
Commercial crops of Roundup Ready soybeans are usually sprayed with the herbicide Roundup (glyphosate). However, both the genetically modified soybean strain and the parent strain that Monsanto used for feed tests were NOT sprayed with Roundup herbicide during cultivation.

Monsanto produced a minimal amount of soybeans grown with applications of Roundup, but only enough to test for glyphosate residues. This testing checked for residual glyphosate, a toxin that kills plants by inhibiting a plant enzyme in the harvested forage, hay and seed. But testing was not done on the effects on other metabolic pathways which must also be taken into account when such artificial genes are inserted.
Several tons of soybeans used in the safety assessments were not produced with Roundup. No explanation is given for this in the documents. For consumers, the test results obtained by using a sample grown differently from the GE- marketed soybean are meaningless.

GE soybean amino acid sequence unknown
The protein Monsanto analysed was from E.coli, not from RoundUp ready soybeans! Testing assumed the protein expressed in the bio-engineered soybean has the same amino acid sequence as the soil bacterium E coliform from which the genetically engineered gene was extracted. This can only be verified when the soybean-produced protein is isolated and the amino acid sequence is determined. Exchanging genes between bacteria and a higher organism can sometimes result in partial change of amino acid and/or post-translational modification after expression. It was presumed Monsanto had determined the amino acid sequence of the GE soybean but it had not.

Monsanto sequenced only 15 amino acids from the protein that was expressed in E. coliform. The rest of the sequence was an assumption about the sequence of the bacterial DNA. They determined only 3.3% of the expected total of 455 amino acids and the protein is not from soybeans. The test described in the documents is the only method to verify antigenic equivalence of proteins. But antigenic similarity itself does not prove that the amino acid sequences are the same. The real sequence of the GE protein in the soybean that we are eating is still unknown.

Animal tests used wrong protein
Acute toxicity tests on rats were also carried out using the protein produced by E. coliform. Monsanto says in the application that extracting large amounts of the GE protein from soybean is difficult. This is an unacceptable excuse because there is a possibility that the inserted gene works differently in soybean than in the original bacterium. Moreover, according to the application document, 0.238mg of GE protein is detected in one gram of genetically modified soybean, which is enough to extract without difficulty.

This kind of problem could be resolved if all the amino acid sequence in GM soybeans had been sequenced and confirmed equal as the bacterium. The experiment appears to have been conducted on the presumption that the other GE soybean proteins are the same as the non-GM soybean as long as they are not toxic. If so, this is too easy an assumption and a one-sided approach. The core of this problem is whether or not the soybean gene is affected by insertion of a foreign gene. The series of experiments described are fundamentally invalid.

Minimal feeding tests
Animal feeding tests are important for safety assessment. Monsanto conducted these experiments on rats, cows, chickens, catfish and quail. However, the scale of the experiments was very inadequate. For example, in rat experiments, raw and toasted soybeans both genetically modified and non-modified were fed to only 10 rats in each group and the feeding period was only 28 days. Toxicity across generations or chronic toxicity will not be measured by such limited experiments.

Even with these far from satisfactory experiments, the data for body and organ weight of liver, kidney and testicles show obvious differences in the male rats between groups fed wild strain soybean and those fed bio-engin eered soybean.

Raw soybean-fed groups showed no difference. But male groups fed toasted GE soybean, weighed 6.7% less than the group fed the ordinary soybean and 13% less than the group fed the commercial feed-mix at the end of the tes t period of 28 days. Though this difference is described as statistically significant in the data sheet, the conclusion ignores these results and states that "no statistical significance is observed."

The experiments were far from satisfactory both in the samples and the statistical method used. The Nagoya University group transcribed all raw data and redid the statistical analysis. The result again showed the apparent growth obstacle for the body and kidney weight in the male rats group fed toasted GE soybean. There was no such difference in the female rats group, possibly due to the amount of the feed intake. Where males took 25-30g /day, female rats took only 18-20g (approx. 70% of male)/day. It is highly possible that female rats would also show significant growth difference if the experiment was conducted on a much larger scale, with a longer feed ing period.

Misinterpretation, false conclusions, ignored data
The Japanese researchers found clearly intentional misinterpretation in the Monsanto assessment. This was caused through ignoring the differences shown in the documents between the ordinary soybean and the GE hybrid. Obvious differences appeared after toasting at actual feed processing condition (108 degrees celsius, 30min). While the concentration of total protein and potassium was not changed, the concentration of trypsin-inhibitor, urease, and lectin were significantly higher in the toasted GM soybean, compared to that of the normal soybean. These physiologically active substances remained active even after heat treatment in the genetically modified soybean. However, those in the herbicide-sensitive normal bean were easily denatured and inactivated.

Monsanto took this result to mean "the modified soybeans are not toasted sufficiently in the experiment" and returned and asked for re-treatment of the sample to Texas A & M laboratory who processed the beans. Monsanto ordered the temperature of re-toast at 220 degrees Celsius for 25 min., which is considerably higher than normal processing of 100 degrees Celsius, 10 minutes. However re-toasting further widened the difference in the activity between the two strains. Another genetically modified soybean inserted with a bacterial gene, also showed high heat-resistant properties.

Scientists would usually conclude by these results that there is substantial difference between the two. But Monsanto dared to challenge this common practice and concluded the second toasting was still not enough. In the end, they toasted two more times and got the result they wanted, i.e. all proteins were denatured and inactivated. With this result, they concluded that genetically modified and non-modified soybeans have equivalent properties.

No protein can withstand repeated heat treatment and stay active. This is common knowledge of protein chemistry. Monsanto based their argument on their presumption that "they can't be different" and their need that "they shouldn't be different." Their translation of the experiment is based on "the conclusion is safe" attitude but it is not at all scientific.

Monsanto asks governments to lower safety standards
Adopting the Roundup tolerant soybean would increase the herbicide concentration in the soybean plants and seeds, because the herbicide is directly sprayed on the plant before harvest. Monsanto studied in detail the resu lts of changing factors like spraying times, concentration of the active ingredient glyphosate, duration of harvest after spraying and growing locations.

The data shows clearly that the concentration of glyphosate and AMPA (a degraded substance of glyphosate) in forage and hay was increased greatly by post-emergence application of the herbicide compared to that of conventi onal pre-emergence application, although the residual concentration in the plant differed from place to place. The largest value of the combined glyphosate and AMPA was 40.187 ppm in forage which is higher than the US saf ety standard of 15 ppm in forage and hay in 1994 when FDA and USDA accepted the application documents.

In the final conclusion, Monsanto says: "the maximum combined glyphosate and AMPA residue level of approximately 40 ppm in soybean forage resulting from these new uses, exceeds the currently established tolerance of 15 ppm. Therefore, an increase in the combined glyphosate and AMPA tolerance for residues in soybean forage will be requested."
The US tolerance standard of combined glyphosate and AMPA in soybean forage was increased to 100 ppm after they approved the GM soybean. The Japanese government also revised the safety standard of combined glyphosate and AMPA in soybean seed from 6ppm to 20ppm in April 2000 at the request of the US government. By legalising the increase, Japan could import soybeans from the US without violating the law.

Monsanto patch-worked the results of experiments with analyses that are full of holes, and manipulated the results. They even requested the revision and lowering of safety standards. The Nagoya University team discovered facts showing inadequate and incomplete safety assessment in the application document by Monsanto. The process of genetic recombination and the results of other animal experiments remained uninspected by the team.

In May 2000, Monsanto informed countries importing US soybeans that Roundup resistant soybeans had two extra gene fragments in the genome. They were there when the US FDA gave the initial approval to the GE soybeans in 1992. All the GE soybeans supplied worldwide contain these gene fragments. Monsanto asserts that these fragmented genes do not create unknown proteins.

But for such basic facts to come to light eight years after the approval is a clear indication of how incomplete is the state of knowledge about the genetic recombination of crops. It also demonstrates how dangerous it is for governments to rely on a commercial company's information for data and safety assessments. We question the wisdom of experts at the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare who concluded that the genetically engineered Roundup Ready soybean was safe, based on such an inadequate and incomplete application.

Postscript: In a note to the editor early August 2003, Professor Kawata said the research on the Monsanto soybean application was sent to Japan's Agriculture and Fisheries Ministry two years ago. However there has been no response from the authority about the flaws discovered in the application, and Professor Kawata still awaits a response from Monsanto-Japan.
- Masaharu Kawata, Assistant Professor, School of Science, Nagoya University, Japan This article was written in May 2001 and has been slightly adapted for publication in Pacific Ecologist.

More heros from Maui County...Elle Cochran, Ua Ritte, and Hemowai Warriors

"Now that I have had a moment to catch my breath, I will somehow try and put into words how grateful I am for all of your love, and support throughout this campaign season.

It was a tough run and a close race to the finish line, I could not have done it without each and every single one of your votes.

To everyone who sent me reassuring messages and motivational notes: thank you; They were very helpful pick-me-ups during difficult moments.

The results tell me that expensive smear campaigns and outside money can influence results, but that the voice of the people that live here is a stronger force to be reckoned with.

I hope to regain the confidence of the rest of the voters over the coarse of the next two years.

I am here to represent the voice of the PEOPLE, that means everyone. My door is always open, my staff does an excellent job making time for everyone that needs to meet with me.

Please call me to set up a meeting, and I will be more than happy to listen.

My office number is: 270-5504
My cell number is: 281-7709

I look forward to working with the community as a whole, for the betterment of everyone.

Together we can move mountains, indeed we already have."
Elle Cochran

"Right on Elle Cochran ! We three made it! CM Margaret D. Wille too! That would be a trifecta win - combined with the wonderful win you folks on Maui accomplished in passing the initiative - I would call it a blow-out All against over $8 million and the largest chemical companies in the world. Time to celebrate, then rest and then redouble our efforts to make good things happen in our community. Imua!"
Gary Hooser‎

"Congratulations to you both as well! It was a tough go for all of us, but the truth and the side of 'good' has prevailed. Now we work even more diligently! Lets do this."
Elle Cochran 

Maui, Betrayal, and Learning About Bio-tech Chemical Corporations

...Today, Hawai’i imports around 85 – 90% of its food.
How and why did this shift? How did Hawai’i, land of abundance, devolve from a miracle of self-sustaining agriculture to an industrial chemical intensive research lab that depends on petroleum and the outside world to feed itself?

There are many answers to this question- but a key shift occurred when certain empowered trustees and land managers opted to change the course of Hawaiian agriculture (thus altering the destiny of Hawai’i itself) from self-sustaining to an agricultural export economy based on imported low-income workers, imported artificial inputs (the first major imported fertilizer was seagull guano) and mono-crop methodology. Native farmers were displaced, water was diverted and polluted, and food began needing to be imported in order to feed the people of Hawai’i. Essentially, when we stopped viewing the ‘Āina as a source of life and sustenance and instead viewed it as a source of manmade riches, we began a centuries long WAR with the ‘āina.
And so, we acknowledge this long time war with the ‘āina. And now, a new chapter has emerged, and the people of Hawai’i are awakened.

They cannot accurately claim that they are safe- because no one has scientifically examined what they are doing. They are not regulated by the State- as Abercrombie famously said in a symposium on big Ag to the Hawai’i biotech execs: “You don’t have to lobby us! We’re here to lobby you!” They are not regulated by the Feds: Michael Taylor, former attorney of, then VP, of Monsanto, is head of Obama’s FDA, while Tom Vilsack, former governor of Iowa (GE corn central) and biotech “Governor of the Year” is head of the USDA. The fox is guarding the henhouse. “The regulators ain’t workin’ for you; they sold you out and you ain’t got a clue” (from my song “The Story of the GMO”). The biotech firms would have you believe that GMO is sound science. It is not. It is a science in its infancy. They would have you believe that they are feeding the world. It is true they are feeding the world- thanks to our compulsory federal subsidies. GE food is cheap because you’ve already paid for it with your taxes. But their claim that the world cannot feed itself without them is pure deceit: economists know that humans produce more food than they can consume- but we throw most of it away. It’s a distribution issue. But most factitious of all of the deception, the biotech firms have defaulted to the excuse that because they have been doing this for years, it is ok to continue.

When you are entrenched in a system that is destructive, there is no easy way out. We are rooted in a heritage of destructive land management practices. We are participants in a centuries long war with the ‘āina. We are partners in a marriage to an agricultural paradigm based on fossil fuels, industrial chemicals and waste byproducts. And you’re afraid of divorce. And they know it.

Divorce is ugly. I watched my parents go through it. It was brutal, destructive, miserable and sobering. But if they hadn’t done it they would’ve destroyed each other, and us.
Untie the knot. Of course it will be messy. Divorce the biotech firms. Call them out. Either way they will continue to fight. And so will we. This won’t end with this vote- it is only the beginning. War is messy, and this is a chance to move it one step closer to the end: end the reign of toxic export agriculture in Hawai’i. Call in the regulators. Wake up and protect Hawai’i. Vote Yes and divorce your complacency. Start healing now, so that the keiki of the future will inherit, not a broken island home, but one that will convey all of the benefits and joys that the Hawaiians of old experienced.

Recreate Hawai’i Now.

Feel free to share this, I wrote it. Aloha, Makana
Two and a half years ago, my friends and I released a film informing the public of Kamehameha Schools/ Bishop Estate (KS) undisclosed land leases to Monsanto for Genetic Engineering (GE) field trials and cultivation of GE seed crops. 9 days after the release of our film, KS altered their website from a sophisticated, greenwashing, “cultural co-optation” propaganda machine to highlight an admittance that they were indeed leasing acreage to Monsanto, and that Monsanto was a “good tenant who paid their bills”. Obviously their messaging was reflective of a limited understanding and the general zeitgeist of that time: basically, “what’s the big deal?”.
It turns out, the “big deal” is that- unbeknownst at that time to not only the world, but the people of Hawai’i- Hawai’i is the top GE seed producer and exporter on Earth.
Makana wrote much more and these excerpts were taken from here...

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

MONSANTO Dead in the Water on the Shores of Maui

Maui County says YES to getting GMOs and associated pesticides off our islands of Maui and Molokai!
  1. Rights Conferred By This Ordinance

    We, the people of Maui County hereby proclaim that the our residents, visitors, Public Trust Resources, and the Environment must be protected from the potentially hazardous health effects, contamination, loss of diversity, environmental and other potentially harmful impacts from the GE Operations and Practices that have not met the standards set forth in this Ordinance. Therefore, we are hereby exercising our right to utilize the County initiative process to impose a moratorium on the propagation, cultivation, raising, or growing of GE Organisms in Maui County in order to protect, our residents, visitors, and the environment, and to call for a detailed environmental impact study of the harms associated with GE Operations and Practices.

SECTION 4: Purpose

The purposes of this Article are:

  1. to protect Maui County’s Environment and Public Trust Resources from transgenic contamination by GE Operations and Practices;
  2. to defend and promote the economic integrity of organic and non GE markets that are harmed by transgenic contamination by GE Operations and Practices ;
  3. to protect Maui County from hazardous aspects of GE Operations and Practices , including but not limited to increased Pesticide use;
  4. to preserve the right of Maui County residents to reject GE Operations and Practices based on health-related, moral, or other concerns; and
  5. to preserve Maui County’s Environment and Public Trust Resources (with its unique and vulnerable ecosystems), while promoting the cultural heritage of the indigenous peoples of Maui and indigenous agricultural Operations and Practices.
This Article shall be liberally construed to fulfill those purposes.

Section 5: Temporary Moratorium.

  1. It is unlawful for any person or entity to knowingly propagate, cultivate, raise, grow or test Genetically Engineered Organisms within the County of Maui until such time that the terms of the (Section 6, below) have been met.
  2. Subsection (1) of this section does NOT apply to:
    1. the propagation, cultivation, raising, growing or testing of GE Organisms that are in mid-growth cycle when this chapter is enacted;
    2. GE Organisms that have been incorporated into any food or medicine in any manner already prepared for sale for human or animal consumption;
    3. any licensed health practitioner who provides diagnosis, care, or treatment to any human patient using products containing GE Organisms; and
    4. any fully accredited college or university that engages in non-commercial scientific research, medical research, or education using GE Organisms, provided that such activities are conducted under enclosed indoor laboratory conditions, with the utmost precautionary measures to prevent accidental release of GE Organisms into the outside environment. “Moratorium Amendment or Repeal” http://voteyesmaui.org/the-law

It's been a huge fight here on Maui and on Molokai to rid Monsanto from our shores...
In 2009 no one even had heard of Monsanto or GMOs...most thought that pesticides were NOT harmful either...
We changed that...
The yes means no, and no means yes strategy didn't work for the pirates this time...
By 800 votes, and the main Honolulu paper was reporting at the end of the night there needed to be 50% plus 1 vote...I went to bed wondering myself....

The 5 SHAKA members who put the moratorium forward are the heroes.

Helped a small way by creating a blog back in 2009 to fight my pesticide poisoning, and to prove that is what disabled me...I knew it was true, but no docs would even investigate...

I proved it...

Why would anyone think it's OK to poison Paradise is beyond belief!
Monsanto now heads to Mexico...

Monsanto has launched a new global center in Mexico focused on developing hybrid strains of corn.

Monsanto plans to invest $90 million over the next five years to centralize its development of corn seed research at the new center, which is based in Tlajomulco de Zuniga, Reuters reports.

"The aim is to create new varieties tolerant to diseases and the stresses that affect maize cultivation all over the world due to growing negative conditions caused by global climate change," Monsanto said in a statement.

The center is part of Monsanto's effort to boost its output of corn, which is the planet's most widely produced grain, according to Reuters.