Saturday, February 21, 2015

Labeling GMOS Not Even Good for the Birds

Hold harmless agreement is what labeling is..."It is OK to to poison us and the world...We can co-exist?   NO NO NO!
"We are a large group of concerned world citizens gathering more and more people everyday. You have been asked no less than 23 times in public and in private message to please answer these questions. We respectfully ask you to do so now, in public, so everyone may have the ability to make up their own mind about the real ideals of food freedom and food protection.

1) I'm confused as to why the labeling campaign wishes to label toxic products who are already labeled by their brand name; Kraft, Kebbler, coke McDonald's, subway etc......whats the point of labeling toxins when the whole thing is one giant chemical.

2) I can't understand why the labeling campaign refuses to mention what is happening inside the NSOB. How the NSOB now seats mostly conventional agriculture producers who get to change the definitions, laws and bylaws for the term of organic. Or how they are allowing chemical fertilizer or chemical pesticides inside of organic farming, while adding more and more behind closed doors in secret. Knowing this, why do you flat out refuse to tell Moms Across America about this vital information?

3) I also notice the label campaign refuses to mention how almost all major store brands of organic are now owned by conventional producers. Knowing this, why do you flat out refuse to tell Moms Across America about this vital information?

4) I don't understand why the labeling campaign never ever mentions these things....never. Will you answer why this is so.

5) Zen, why do consistently block more and more Mom activists who ask you these simple questions concerning food freedom?

Every person does have the right to know what goes into their body, but if the terms are being reworded and definitions are being changed for these toxic allowances in organic, how are these foods different from conventional phudes?

It took me a very long time to understand myself, and I also pushed for wasn't until I found out who is on the boards of the NSOB and OCA did it finally hit me, labeling is being promoted to sidetrack and hide the real issue.

Labeling allows for:
*GMO coexistence
*Makes people believe eating GMO free is the same as eating organic
*More corporate ruled Government
terms to be redefined and changed by chemical makers over Organic definitions.

They need to be banned Completely from organic so people have a real choice.. The label campaign was created by the chemical makers in order to side track this issue, if it wasn't created for this, then it has been co-opted by them at some juncture.

We are not protected from pesticides under the label, nor are we protected from GMOs. They just allow us to know.

Most people believe GMO free means organic, because the label campaign has created this illusion of safety. Voting or demanding labeling does absolutely nothing for the protection of food whatsoever.

There is absolutely no choice when organic standards are compromised."
Rudy Twomoon

USDA certified organic foods may be corrupted by genetically modified organisms. This presentation reveals the federal statutes that actually allow for this to happen, by way of "careless" verbiage. It is shorter and better informed version of a presentation released last year, by the same name.

In addition to what is mentioned in the video, I'd like paraphrase from S205.204 (a)(1), that organically "produced" seeds from non-organic seed stock are stated to be solely used for edible sprouts... but back to S205.204 (a)(1): if someone files a variance, then technically if they grow a crop from non organic seeds under that specific clause, there is no verbiage preventing them from using those seeds for livestock or people in S205.201 or in 205.204 (a)(3), unlike in S205.204 (a)(1), where the Except clause is part of the complete statement. The Except clause should be a crucial separate clause in itself, applicable to all of them. Incomplete/loophole verbiage here that a corporation could weasel out of.

Published February 21, 2015, filed under MEDIA
GMO labeling or banning

Weather to label or go straight for the ban is a discussion we at TLB are hearing more about by the day, and this has the potential to split a strong movement gaining strength across this nation. This is what I see as the weakness of putting all our eggs in the labeling basket …
Labeling is a Trojan horse … Once successful it will dissuade many from continuing in the struggle to ban these poisons all together, and victory will be declared.
Except it will not outlaw the use of bio-toxins, it will not stop cross contamination or horizontal gene transfer, or any other evil associated with GM or GE products. The biosphere, the poorer factions of humanity and those without a voice will continue to be poisoned. How does this factor into your drive for labeling?
We at TLB do understand and appreciate the argument for labeling, but do not necessarily agree, because success on labeling will do nothing but hamper forward motion for outright banning with Biotech and the government stating, You asked for labeling and we gave it to you, and that is all you get (obviously not these words but you get the gist)!
So in retrospect most will wake up to the fact that they have accomplished next to nothing. Any struggle from that point on will be exponentially more difficult, if possible at all.
Do we at TLB appreciate all those who work diligently for labeling? YES! Do we believe their hearts (most, not all) are pure and in the right place? YES … but …
I used to support labeling strongly myself, but via all the research and digging TLB has done over the years I have come to realize … Labeling is a trap or a Trojan horse to placate the angry masses and put control of the endgame in Biotech’s hands!
The following (recorded) discussion delves into this topic much deeper. Please take the time to listed …

TLB Special (archived) with Lynnette Marie,

The Organic Guru

TLB radio
Click on image to hear show.
Please visit Lynnette at Fuel For The Body

From The Liberty Beacon @

Ukraine Monsanto Radiation IMF

Assault and Battery in Europe...The last thing these old countries need is radioactive fallout dug up and sprayed with pesticides, RNAi remember!...To dust the Earth all around them. Rachel Carson warned about mixing those 2 together.
Since 1986 Chernobyl nuclear  disaster, which is in Ukraine, this area has been in dire straits...Right now the cement encasing that somewhat kept the radiation down is falling down, and no one knows what to do.
So, what to do? How about take over the country, bring in Monsanto, and try to cover up all the dangers with the lies of their new rulers--Monsanto Agents. My take.
 Below you will see 2 videos...1 is about Chernobyl and the other about the "Secret Chernobyl" in the USA. You will learn some extremely important information about your everyday life being radiated unknown to you. 
For example: When you go to Mt. Rushmore you are breathing radioactive dust. It is in the water in the motels and park areas too.
And it is blowing all over the country.
Learn more...

 Rachel Carson~ 
"This pollution is for the most part irrecoverable; the chain of evil it initiates not only in the world that must support life but in living tissues is for the most part irreversible. In this now universal contamination of the environment, chemicals are the sinister and little-recognized partners of radiation in changing the very nature of the worldtine very nature of its life. Strontium 90, released through nuclear explosions into the air, comes to earth in rain or drifts down as fallout, lodges in soil, enters into the grass or corn or wheat grown there, and in time takes up its abode in the bones of a human being, there to remain until his death. Similarly, chemicals sprayed on croplands or forests or gardens lie long in soil, entering into living organisms, passing from one to another in a chain of poisoning and death. Or they pass mysteriously by underground streams until they emerge and, through the alchemy of air and sunlight, combine into new forms that kill vegetation, sicken cattle, and work unknown harm on those who drink from once pure wells. As Albert Schweitzer has said, "Man can hardly even recognize the devils of his own creation."
... Radiation is no longer merely the background radiation of rocks, the bombardment of cosmic rays, the ultraviolet of the sun that have existed before there was any life on earth; radiation is now the unnatural creation of man's tampering with the atom. The chemicals to which life is asked to make its adjustment are no longer merely the calcium and silica and copper and all the rest of the minerals washed out of the rocks and carried in rivers to the sea; they are the synthetic creations of man's inventive mind, brewed in his laboratories, and having no counterparts in nature...
To adjust to these chemicals would require time on the scale that is nature's; it would require not merely the years of a man's life but the life of generations. And even this, were it by some miracle possible, would be futile, for the new chemicals come from our laboratories in an endless stream; almost five hundred annually find their way into actual use in the United States alone. The figure is staggering and its implications are not easily grasped500 new chemicals to which the bodies of men and animals are required somehow to adapt each year, chemicals totally outside the limits of biologic experience."

Ukraine Agrees To Monsanto Land Grab For $17 Billion IMF Loan

The World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) is helping biotech run the latest war in Ukraine. Make no mistake that what is happening in the Ukraine now is deeply tied to the interests of Monsanto, Dow, Bayer, and other big players in the poison food game.
Monsanto has an office in Ukraine. While this does not shout ‘culpability’ from every corner, it is no different than the US military’s habit to place bases in places that they want to gain political control. The opening of this office coincided with land grabs with loans from the IMF and World Bank to one of the world’s most hated corporations – all in support of their biotech takeover.
Previously, there was a ban on private sector land ownership in the country – but it was lifted ‘just in time’ for Monsanto to have its way with the Ukraine.
In fact, a bit of political maneuvering by the IMF gave the Ukraine a $17 billion loan – but only if they would open up to biotech farming and the selling of Monsanto’s poison crops and chemicals – destroying a farmland that is one of the most pristine in all of Europe. Farm equipment dealer, Deere, along with seed producers Dupont and Monsanto, will have a heyday.
In the guise of ‘aid,’ a claim has been made on Ukraine’s vast agricultural riches. It is the world’s third largest exporter of corn and fifth largest exporter of wheat. Ukraine has deep, rich, black soil that can grow almost anything, and its ability to produce high volumes of GM grain is what made biotech come rushing to take it over.
As reported by The Ecologist, according to the Oakland Institute:
“Whereas Ukraine does not allow the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture, Article 404 of the EU agreement, which relates to agriculture, includes a clause that has generally gone unnoticed: it indicates, among other things, that both parties will cooperate to extend the use of biotechnologies.
There is no doubt that this provision meets the expectations of the agribusiness industry. As observed by Michael Cox, research director at the investment bank Piper Jaffray, ‘Ukraine and, to a wider extent, Eastern Europe, are among the most promising growth markets for farm-equipment giant Deere, as well as seed producers Monsanto and DuPont’.”
The nation WAS Europe’s breadbasket – and now in an act of bio-warfare, it will become the wasteland that many US farmlands have become due to copious amounts of herbicide spraying, the depletion of soil, and the overall disruption of a perfect ecosystem.
The aim of US government entities is to support the takeover of Ukraine for biotech interests (among other strategies involving the prop-up of a failing cabalistic banking system that Russia has also refused with its new alignment with BRICS and its own payment system called SWIFT). This is similar to biotech’s desired takeover of Hawaiian islands and land in Africa.
The Ukraine war has many angles that haven’t been exposed to the general public – and you can bet that biotech has their hands in the proverbial corn pie.

The sarcophagus is actually held up by the damaged remains of Reactor 4, and it is structurally unsound. It is estimated that up to 95% of the original radioactive inventory of Reactor 4 still remains inside the ruins of the building. Seeing that the original sarcophagus was not intended to be a permanent solution, the Ukraine government held an international competition in 1992 to find a proposal for a permanent replacement structure to contain the reactor site.
After a period of 15 years, and out of 394 entries, the French consortium Novarka with 50/50 partners Vinci Construction Grands Projets and Bouygues Travaux Publics, were contracted on Sept. 17, 2007 to build the New Safe Confinement (NSC). The winners were actually the top three entries, with a UK submission for a sliding arch approach being the best idea for protecting workers.
The $432 Euros contract was to be used for design and construction, as well as as many as 900 workers. At the time, it was expected that the project would be completed by 2015. While the date for the New Safe Confinement structure, whatever the source, was to have been completed by 2005, it has obviously encountered a number of setbacks and delays. As of 2013, it was well understood that the EBRD was in control of not only managing the containment plans, but also was overseeing the construction.

Read more:

All work to cover and contain this mess has been suspended...NO MONEY!